Showing posts with label Brussels. Show all posts

All we are saying… is give AST-SCs a chance!




All we are saying… is give AST-SCs a chance! 




There is no doubt that AST-SC colleagues are constantly being let down by our institution's staff policy and this is no longer acceptable! 

Enough is enough! AST-SC colleagues have always been treated as “Children of a lesser God”, by our administration, whether in terms of promotions or opportunities for career advancement through internal competitions. 
 
R&D has always been a vocal opponent of this scandalous practice ( R&D  alongside AST/SC colleagues! – Renouveau & Démocratie (renouveau-democratie.eu), by putting all its skills and efforts at the service of AST SC colleagues and with the help of leading experts in all fields. 

 As the FIRST trade union of European public service, we have always used the best practices also of other institutions to fight the bad practices of the Commission and reject any unreasonable decision of our administration. 

The NON-PROMOTION EXERCISE: a catastrophic three-act saga for AST-SCs! 

First act: “Sorry dear colleague, your performance has been outstanding! We would have proposed you for promotion, but there was not a single quota in our DG for your grade”. 

Every year, around the month of June, the Administration publishes in SYSPER2 the list of colleagues that are proposed by their Directors-General for a promotion to the higher grade. Unfortunately, very few AST-SC colleagues are on this list! 

When most of the AST-SC colleagues meet with their line managers in order to understand why they didn’t get the desired promotion, they always receive a very frustrating reply, confirming the very high quality of their performance without being able to reward them the due to the desperate lack of promotions’ quota (or very limited) in the DG for AST-SCs! And unfortunately for us, this disappointing response is not the typical excuse given often by managers, but absolutely true, because in many DGs the Available quotas are 0 or 1, for all SCs categories together. 

Second act: “An appeal is your only option!” 

Following the non-proposal for a promotion, the DGs and HR correspondents encouraged the outstanding AST-SC colleagues who could not even be considered for promotion due to a lack of quota to go on launching an appeal, while themselves would support the colleagues by sending an exceptional request to the administration in order to increase the SCs’ promotion possibilities. Too good though to be true… 

Third and final (?) act: “Adding insult to injury!!” 

The (NON) promotions exercise is concluded at the beginning of November, where the additional list of successful appeals is added to the list of June. For the 2023 the publication of the proposals for promotion in June and the final published list in November included the following results for the entire Commission: 


A first visual inspection of this table shows that DG-HR reserved just eleven (11) quotas for the promotion of SC colleagues during the appeals phase. In these circumstances, it is clear that despite all its more than admirable efforts, the Joint Promotions Committee has no way of providing a satisfactory response to colleagues' more than legitimate expectations. And, within this “War of the poor”, out of these 11 quotas, nothing was given to SC4s or to SC3s. Just two SC2 colleagues and 9 SC1s. That is why, even the encouragement to appeal, wasn’t but an additional disappointment to the already extremely frustrated colleagues. 

R&D wonders? In the end, is the letter and spirit of article 45 of the Staff Regulation really applied for AST-SCs? 

In fact, when an entire DG is not given any quota for a given grade and it is not possible to get quotas down from higher grades, it means that for our AST-SC colleagues, in these grades and in this specific DG, the Article 45 of the Staff Regulations is not really applied. And while, DG-HR will always find a way to (try to) convince us that the AST-SC promotions “algorithm” respects the Annex I of the staff regulations, the truth is probably far from that. 

Not all algorithms are the same, obviously… 

Worse still, every year it becomes clear that some highly visible AD colleagues, "sitting close to the sun" are promoted with much less seniority in their grade compared to the seniority provided for in Annex IB. 

Internal AST-SCs competitions – 

NOT THE FOURTH ACT of the story but a real opportunity for our colleagues, which we are going to defend! 

However, this file had already got off a very bad start: as soon as the Commission's new policy on internal competitions was announced, R&D  stated that it was incredible that there should be ABSOLUTELY NO provision for the AST-SC! 

The administration's response was that the Staff Regulations did not permit the organisation of such internal competitions. R&D  immediately supported the petition organised by our colleagues in TAO-AFI, members of the Alliance to which we belong, asking for internal competitions to be organised for AST-SC colleagues. 

The immediate consequence of this unacceptable approach was, of course that many AST-SC colleagues left the Commission to join other Institutions that were more responsive to the legitimate demands and expectations of our colleagues. 
 
With the aim of countering the administration’s arguments and proving that they had no basis, R&D  presented the ‘good practices’ that our R&D ’s sections in other institutions had negotiated, namely at the Committee of the Regions, European Council, European Parliament, etc... that had actually organised such internal competitions for AST-SC under the same Staff Regulations. 
 
Better late than never: reason has finally prevailed! 

We are pleased to say that we have won a battle here and that our advocacy has tipped the scales, as the administration has finally announced that an internal competition will be held to allow AST-SC colleagues to access the AST career will be published before the end of 2023. 
 
However, R&D  deeply regrets to see the departure of highly qualified AST-SC colleagues as a result of the administration's refusal to accept immediately the legitimate requests to rectify this injustice. 
 
FACTA NON VERBA! 

Making big announcements is no longer enough! Action must be taken. And it's not enough just to act; it's all about doing the right things. 

Thus, finally announcing that these internal competitions will be organised for AST-SCs is not enough. 

These internal competitions must finally meet our colleagues' AST-SC more than legitimate expectations concerning: 

- how many posts will be on the reserve list, 
- the grades of access,
- the frequency of their organisation. 
 
R&D  will ensure that all these requirements be duly taken into account in the internal competitions organised for AST-SC. 

Enough of a piecemeal strategy

R&D  calls on the Commission to meet our demands and the expectations of our AST-SC colleagues by offering them real career development, while at the same time repairing the damage caused by delays in their careers for which the Commission alone is responsible. 

Cristiano Sebastiani, 
President

SAVE THE DATE : 03/10 - Cyberbullying: Let’s Talk About It! & REPLAYS

 


 

 

 


  For joining the e-conference  click on this 

https://renouveau-et-democratie.webex.com/renouveau-et-democratie/j.php?MTID=m92b96e77e12654a406a663e8963a4eb1

 
This conference will be held in  French - You will be able to intervene in English

 Join us to explore the world of cyberbullying and take action to support children and families affected by it.

Cyberbullying is a form of cyber violence characterized by its repetition and duration. It encompasses various actions in the digital space, including humiliation, threats, insults, slander, gossip, rumors (denigration), the use of aggressive or sexually related text (sexting), or the public dissemination of intimate images or information (outing). These actions can have severe consequences for the victims. Whether it takes the form of aggressive instant messaging (flaming) or repeated offensive and violent messages (harassment), cyberbullying often acts as an echo chamber, magnifying the effects of harassment. The immediate multiplication of bystanders further intensifies the impact of violence in an uncontrollable manner.
 

At this conference, you will learn to recognize and respond to instances of digital space misuse that can lead to harm. We will dis¬cuss prevention strategies, how to deal with cyberbullying, ways to protect our children, and effective actions to address this issue.
 

Our guest speaker, Bruno Humbeeck, will answer your questions and provide valuable advice on helping children navigate and overcome cyberbullying.


Don't hesitate to join us and ask your questions!

 
For more information, please contact us by email: OSP-RD@ec.europa.eu

 

 

SAVE THE DATE 21/06/23 - Conférence - "TRAVAIL HYBRIDE : les défis du management et du personnel!"


Afin de rejoindre l’e-conférence veuillez cliquer sur le lien suivant:

https://renouveau-et-democratie.webex.com/renouveau-et-democratie/j.php?MTID=mb4af3406584febfed3a434d8a40dbf36





Il faut repenser le lien de subordination dans le monde du travail

Danièle LINHART


Le travail hybride, une nouvelle organisation du travail!

 Le travail hybride fait partie dorénavant de notre vie quotidienne. Il apporterait une meilleure conciliation de la vie privée et de la vie professionnelle tout en s’assurant de respecter le droit à la déconnection. 

Ce nouveau mode de travail nécessite tout de même un management et une organisation du travail basés sur la confiance.

Quels sont les défis que les managers et le personnel doivent surmonter afin d’atteindre cet équilibre et pouvoir travailler en toute sérénité?

Afin d ’y répondre, R&D a fait appel, une fois de plus,

à Danièle LINHART, afin de nous apporter son expertise!

Pour de plus amples informations, merci de nous contacter par email: OSP-RD@ec.europa.eu

La conférence se tiendra en français. Vous pourrez poser vos questions en anglais


SAVE THE DATE - 4 May - THE PICARD CASE _Pension rights

 

In case you were unable to attend the conference, you will find the complete recording below:

REPLAY – The Picard case concerning the continuity of pension rights

You can follow the conference

by attending : room SPAAK 6B1 (European Parliament) or online by clicking on this link.

https://renouveau-et-democratie.webex.com/renouveau-et-democratie/j.php?MTID=m96ab9354cb45884a403f0eeb70dc2761

 

  You were a contract agent or a temporary agent before 1 May 2004 or before 1 January 2014 and you have been appointed as an official after these dates ?  

You were a contract agent or a temporary agent before 1 May 2004 or before 1 January 2014 and you have changed status or you have been recruited with a new contract after these dates ?

You may be affected by the new very IMPORTANT Case Law C-366/21 from 15 December 2022,

the PICARD CASE concerning the continuity of pension rights

Other Trade Unions have conveyed contradictory information to colleagues potentially involved: from the compulsory necessity to introduce a collective Article 90 to the ex officio automatic application of the Picard Case Law to all colleagues in all the EU Institutions.

R&D wants to convey the correct information

and let colleagues concerned ask questions in this regard to the best expert in the field.

This is why R&D invites all colleagues potentially concerned to attend the conference with our specialist lawyer,

Maître Sébastien ORLANDI, the lawyer who won the Picard case concerning the continuity of pension rights after the Reform of the Staff Regulations - for CAs, TAs and those who have become officials in the meantime.

This conference will be held in English. You can ask your questions in French

E-conference 23/11/22 - Supplementary Health Insurance

 


UPDATE : For those who could not attend the e-conference on the 23rd of November, you will find the replay and all related materials on the following link e-conference : « Supplementary Health Insurance » – Renouveau & Démocratie (renouveau-democratie.eu)

********************* 

R&D is pleased to invite you to the e-conference

    « Supplementary Health Insurance »

How can such insurance help you in case of extra costs in Luxembourg?

How do you know if such insurance is necessary?

How do you figure out which insurance is best for you?

 23 November at 13h-14h30

With

Serge CRUTZEN - Former Official

Serge co-operates with DG HR to provide accurate information on supplementary
insurance. In an impartial approach, he shall present a comparative study of these
available insurance policies

The - sometimes-limited - reimbursements of the JSIS (ceilings, excessiveness, 

exclusions,...) may yield significant costs for you in case of illness and hospitalisation.   
If you are ill or have an accident during your holiday, some hospitals do not accept 
the JSIS and require immediate payment.A supplementary insurance could help you avoid this 
situation.

If you wish to participate, please click on the YES/NO voting button attached to this
invitation and do not forget to save the dates in your Outlook calendar.

To join the meeting you should follow :
THIS LINK
  
Should you have any questions, please contact  : OSP-RD@ec.europa.eu

 
 
******************************************



 

 













Le Renard Déchaîné special " Court of Auditors EU Institutions and COVID-19 Special Report" - The Court of Auditors confirms the analyses of R&D and acknowledges the exceptional efforts made by the staff!

 

Le Renard Déchaîné special " Court of Auditors EU Institutions and COVID-19 Special Report" - The Court of Auditors confirms the analyses of R&D and acknowledges the exceptional efforts made by the staff!

 

Court of Auditors

EU Institutions and COVID-19

Special Report

 In its special report on the institutions' response to the Covid-19 pandemic, the Court of Auditors confirms the analyses of R&D and acknowledges the exceptional efforts made by the staff!

The Commission's staff deserves all the institution's trust and has proven that a modern and flexible man¬agement model is the best response to the challenges!


 ……READ MORE

 

 


 








THE TAXATION OF INTERNATIONAL OFFICIALS of ITALIA ORIGIN - LA FISCALITÀ DEI FUNZIONARI INTERNAZIONALI di ORIGINE ITALIANA

 

 


You can find below the presentation slides and documents relating to the conference held on Friday, 24 June on the taxation of international officials organised by R&D Brussels :


 
 
 
 
 

 

https://renouveau-democratie.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/2019-DL-201-2011-7.pdf

https://renouveau-democratie.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Art-12-DL-78-2009-1-1.pdf

https://renouveau-democratie.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Protocollo-7-Privilegi-e-immunità-UE-IT.pdf

Opening and introductory greetings/remarks / Apertura e saluti introduttivi

Cristiano Sebastiani

President of R&D / Presidente di R&D

Gen. (c.a.) Alessandro Butticé,

President of the Brussels-European Union Section  of ANFI*

Presidente della Sezione di Bruxelles-Unione Europea dell’ANFI

***

Gen. (r) Prof. Avv. Pierpaolo Rossi,

Vice-President of the Brussels-European Union Section ANFI and

Counsellor at the Legal Service of the European Commission

Vicepresidente della Sezione di Bruxelles-Unione Europea ANFI e

Consigliere presso il Servizio Giuridico della Commissione Europea

Ten. (r) Prof. Avv. Francesco Fratini,
Brussels-European Union ANFI Section, tax lawyer.

Sezione di Bruxelles-Unione Europea ANFI, tributarista.

*ANFI (Associazione Nazionale Finanzieri d’Italia – National Association of Italian Financial Police)

***************************************

1. Criteri per la definizione del domicilio fiscale ai fini delle imposte sui redditi e patrimoniali, e delle imposte su successioni e donazioni / Criteria for defining tax residence for the purposes of income and estate tax and succession and donations tax

2. L’Incrocio tra Protocollo privilegi e immunità dell’Unione diritto interno e trattati per evitare le doppie imposizioni / The Conflict between the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities of the Union domestic law and treaties for the avoidance of double taxation

3. Aspetti dichiarativi per Imposte sui redditi; redditi finanziari; redditi immobiliari; redditi da lavoro e da pensione), profili applicativi, fattispecie ricorrenti e chiarimenti di prassi / Declaratory aspects for income tax; financial income; property income; employment and pension income), application profiles, recurring cases and clarifications of practice

4. Aspetti dichiarativi per imposte patrimoniali (IVAFE e IVIE), profili applicativi, fattispecie ricorren­ti e chiarimenti di prassi / Declaratory aspects for wealth taxes (IVAFE and IVIE), application profi­les, recurring cases and clarifications of practice

5. Dichiarazioni integrative e ravvedimento operoso / Complementary declarations and tax amne­sty

6. Attività di verifica da parte delle autorità fiscali: controlli incrociati su banche dati, lettere di com­pliance ed eventuale ravvedimento / Verification activities by tax authorities: cross-checks on data­bases, compliance letters and possible amends 

7. La tassazione delle prime case in Italia dei residenti all’estero di origine italiana / Taxation of first residences in Italy of Italian-born foreign residents

Modera / Moderator : Gen. (c.a.) Alessandro Butticé

You can now watch the replay of our 50 conferences on our R&D YOUTUBE channel !


More than 16.000 of you have attended our conferences.

Thank you very much for your TRUST!

You can already access all the REPLAY on our YOUTUBE channel !

Subscribe to be notified when a video is published

R&D has chosen the best experts to safeguard your health and well-being 

but also to provide concrete proposals based on the expertise of our guest speakers!

You asked us, we did it!

It is more than 50 conferences, in less than a year, gathering distinguished academics, researchers, virologists, MEPs, doctors in psy­chology, sociology, educational psychology... to inform you, to be attentive to you and to jointly prepare the proposals pre­sented during the social dialogue meetings as well as to prepare our work programme 2021-2024.

 YES, this programme is the output of common labour, YOU, the EXPERTS and R&D!

 

Analysis of psychosocial risk factors (see Renard Déchaîné special Analysis of psychosocial risk fac­tors in our services )

THE HUMAN AT THE HEART OF MANAGEMENT

R&D has always called for management to lead by example and to move towards a culture of trust, which is also reflected in Commissioner Hahn’s statements. It is essential to change the managerial culture !

CONTENT AND MEANING AT WORK

An insignificant and repetitive work content favours, in the long run, the settling of monotony and a loss of meaning in the work, both of which are elements of psychosocial risk. It is necessary to implement the meaning of work

CAREER & RECOGNITION

Our mandate is well defined: we are committed to ‘staff unity’, rejecting any corporatist, competitive and divisive approach! The Commission must definitively ban social dumping!

HEALTH & PREVENTION OF PSYCHOSOCIAL RISK

Occupational health then becomes a measure to assess the well-being and working conditions of colleagues.

WORKING ENVIRONMENT

The working environment is a key element in ensuring the well-being and health of staff. This environment cannot be de­signed without prior study of the specific nature of the jobs and the conditions in which the work must be carried out

EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES

Without a genuine equal opportunities policy, the Commission as an employer can neither be attractive nor enable its staff to evolve. This is why, through its actions R&D was already advocating for this strategy well before the Commis­sion’s proposal 

 

« Management HUMAIN »

Laurent TASKIN, Holder of the HR lab Chair in Management in « Management Humain » and Work Transformation at UCL, Doctor in economic and management sciences, professor of management, researcher

Danièle LINHART, Labour sociologist, Emeritus Research Director at the CNRS*, member of the GTM-CRESPPA* laboratory, UMR-CNRS-Universities of Paris 8 and Paris 10

Eric CHABOT, Coach d’entreprise et entrepreneurs -CBS Partners France 

 

 

SAVE THE DATES -11 new e-Conferences of the Renard _ R&D

 

SAVE THE DATES

  11 new e-Conferences of the Renard 

 

 More than 14500 of you have attended  

our latest 40 e-conferences

 see the « replay »

Thank you very much !

R&D is organising a new series of e-conferences to promote the implementation of a "Management of Trust" as well as for the prevention of psychosocial risks, health and ergonomics

 R&D, as always, at your side and in tune with you


 

 

 

 

 

 

We expect much more and much better! The administration must review its HR Strategy paper

 


R&D calls for putting the

« HUMAN »

At the heart of the Human Resources management

of our Institution!

We expect much more and much better!

The administration must review its HR Strategy paper
 
 "United we stand, divided we fall"

R&D has always been aware that only the greatest unity of action of staff representation can achieve the results that colleagues expect and deserve.
 
For R&D , solidarity is also the duty to take into account the specific needs of colleagues while never deepening existing divisions by advocating the setting of scores between colleagues and generations…
 
In all our actions, R&D brings together all the staff in its diversity and richness; this is R&D's strength and it is on this basis that R&D has become the leading trade union in our European civil service at inter-institutional level!
 
The new strategy proposed by DG HR calls for some changes in the current functioning of the Commission services.
 
On paper, the proposal contains some avenues, but it is still far from providing concrete solutions nor the necessary guarantees for this change.
 
We have already asked the institution to have the courage to openly display its real objectives of this “modernisation” and to explain on which grounds it is build, without once again hiding behind empty slogans.
 
The Court of Auditors has already invited the Commission to have “a better preparation and more rigorous monitoring of reform measures”.
 
We regret to confirm that all our questions are still open namely:
 
A MODERNISATION BASED ON WHAT? :
“It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data.
Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts”
 
A MODERNISATION WHAT FOR? :
« Ignoranti quem portum petat nullus suus ventus est » 

Worse still, the decision falls more than short on setting a clear and effective governance of the processes: DG HR now seems to have completely abdicated its role as guardian of the proper application of the Staff Regulations and their application procedures, limiting itself to presenting simple and very vague recommendations with the obvious aim of letting each DG implement its own staff policy.

Under these conditions, rather than modernising our institution's HR strategy, we risk seeing the implementation of 45 HR strategies.
 
The best example of this disastrous and unacceptable approach is the draft decision on the New Normal, which sets out very vague general principles stipulating that on this basis each DG will be able to adopt and implement its own “New Normal. There is no mechanism at central level for detecting and remedying any abuses.

In view of the foregoing, more and different things need to be done for R&D!

On these grounds, here are - in brief - the recommendations of R&D, which will be developed in specific papers:
 
Working conditions
 
Hot desking, Open Space
 
R&D has already made clear its total and outright refusal, the adverse consequences of these two office arrangements, are no longer to be demonstrated.

How can DG HR be so ill-advised as to saying that they want to create “a flexible, inclusive and sustainable working environment”, if colleagues move from day to day in open spaces and “hot-desking”, without having been involved in the decision-making process, without having expressed their ideas or wishes and without any involvement of staff representation!
  
Especially as this is happening in the midst of a health crisis. Here, staff are faced with a fait accompli! 

Even worst, the OIB seems to believe that hot desking can work without any appropriate supplies such as efficient IT equipment, notably headset with proper noise cancellation, wireless ergonomic keyboard and mouse… Adding colourful sofas in a corner does not turn an old-fashioned office space into a dynamic workspace.
 
How can decently management support such evolution in maintaining their privileged private office? Being a boss is not difficult but being a leader implies gaining trust of the staff and being inspiring.
 
We are a long way from “leading by example” as promoted by the Commissioner Hahn.
 
• The green dimension and the commitment to reduce emissions are compatible with an innovative building policy; no excuse for unacceptable office arrangements.

• Special attention should be paid to colleagues with special needs (disabilities, vulnerable persons, etc.).

• As a rule, no decision on office refurbishment should be taken without prior consultation of colleagues from the DG concerned and the Joint Committee on Prevention and Protection at Work (CPPT). See our dossier

A credible new HR strategy starts by changing the managerial culture

More than just artificially multiply managerial posts, we must change the managerial culture of our institution, which implies a key responsibility upon managers!
  
“Focusing on tasks and not hierarchies” - was one of the first messages of President von der Leyen.

Still since decades, the Commission talks about abolishing silos but never walks the talk. Let’s finally do it!  

Implications for the managers and for the individual staff member are manifold. Therefore, managerial implications are numerous: raise awareness, offer support, empower, organise and reward the colleagues who deserve it. 

Leadership is not only about task distribution in line with organisational strategy and even less “obsessive staff control” of the staff. 

Leadership it first of all maintaining a cohesive social unity, building the team and meeting the needs of EACH member of the staff.  
 
Managers must encourage the staff to engage in something they care about, to assume a more personal role in the group, and to be a bit stubborn about an early-stage idea they want to champion.
As a manager it’s not only a matter of appreciating the hard figures in terms of measurements, but also appreciating and valuing new learning and insights generated and put forward by staff.

Hybrid working in the “New Normal”

• Telework and office presence must be put on a truly equal footing and their balance cannot be left to the sole decision of line managers.

• Clear rules must be set at the level of the Commission, DG HR must play a clear role in avoiding inconsistencies and abuses and it is not acceptable that each Director General is allowed to define her/his personal “New Normal’ policy.
 
• Colleagues must be offered real opportunities accompanied by clear guidelines to telework outside the place of employment.
 
• In particular, it is no longer acceptable that our secretaries and assistants colleagues are constantly discriminated against. It is worth recalling that before the Covid-19 crisis, most AST/SCs and AC FG2 had limited access to telework.
Moreover, in many cases, these colleagues are considered ‘critical’ and have therefore been asked to come physically to the office.
The crisis and the lockdown proved that in our new digital era, they can perform their tasks remotely like any other staff member. The imple¬mentation of the new Commission decision must ensure widespread access to structural telework for secretaries and assistants.
 
• A lump sum covering cost of teleworks must be provided: as regards the reimbursement of an office chair, an indefinite time extension has to be granted.

• A joint committee responsible for ensuring the proper application of the rules, preventing, and sanctioning any inappropriate decision must be set up. The interests of the service must not be able to justify everything!

A green workplace

• This should also apply to our furniture and office supplies catalogue
 
• The Commission must provide a 100 % reimbursement of public transport.
 
• The Commission must offer more local products (short food channels) in our canteens and cafeterias.

Recruitment and Selection

• The Commission must once and for all put an end to social dumping and ensure that the category and function group correspond to the level of tasks performed.

A genuine annual internal competition policy

It is compulsory to set in close collaboration with the staff representation a genuine annual internal competition policy ensuring transparency and fairness of the procedure, focusing on colleagues’ skills, providing real and fair opportunities of tenure for CA and TA colleagues and also enabling real career development for AST-SC, AST and post 2004 AD colleagues in order to finally take into account the level of colleagues’ actual tasks.
 
A genuine annual internal competition policy is also the only viable solution in order to take into account the concerns of our post 2004 and POST 2014 colleagues.
 
The professional junior programme must be fully transparent and fully accessible for AST, AST-SC and AC existing staff of all grades, with selection procedure and criteria being non-discriminatory and by considerably extending the current 3 years limit of professional experience (AST, AST-SC and AC staff have more than 3 years of professional experience) eventually with a new professional programme reserved for more experienced candidates.
 
The need to ensure geographical balance is equitable issue but cannot be used to undermine the fairness and transparency of recruitment and appointment procedures.

    
Ethics is not an empty slogan

Internal competitions and appointment procedures especially those organised only at the end of the mandate of each Commission in order to serve the “parachuting” of colleagues into cabinets must be stopped once and for all.
 
The external publications of management positions must not encourage cronyism and nepotism: all too often the laureate is known before the procedure is launched and sometimes the “external candidate” is already working at the Commission….


Specific needs require dedicated responses

Our mandate a clear commitment to staff unity and a strong opposition to any corporatist approach aimed at dividing staff and, or even worse, pitting groups of colleagues against each other, we must never prevent to provide an appropriate response to the specific difficulties and needs encountered by different categories of colleagues.
 
To deny the existence of these specific problems and not to give an adequate response to them will strengthen the power of who aim to divide the staff.

R&D alongside with AD’s colleagues


Real career opportunities and career development must be offered to colleagues who do not wish to take up management positions, by making practical use of their skills.
 
Provide concrete alternatives for colleagues at the end of their careers to enable them to progress and not remain stuck at AD12 grade. Not everyone wants to be a manager; there should be more opportunities to be a senior expert.
 
Middle managers, who are in daily contact with staff, must be able to carry out their tasks of coordinating colleagues, not be reduced to the role of mere executor by a more intrusive senior management too often fascinated by micro-management.

R&D alongside with AST colleagues

Stop social doping ! The Commission must duly recognise the value and reward the contribution of ASTs according to the tasks they perform. We are a long way from the motto: the right person in the right place.
 
It is important to offer more possibilities to access certification, many AST colleagues have been doing AD work for years without any acknowledgement and/or reward.
 
It is urgent to offer more opportunities and fair procedures for ASTs to be appointed as team leaders, project leaders as well as Senior Assistants.
 
Greater mobility must be organised for ASTs, especially at the end of their career also offering more targeted training to facilitate their work and career development.

R&D alongside with AST/SC colleagues

Stop social doping ! The new HR Strategy focuses on three strategic priorities to address the common challenges facing the Commission: attractiveness, recruitment and selection, and career prospects, but it does not bring any new element for the AST/SC category.
 
The perception of the Commission as an attractive employer varies according to the category of recruitment, and it is certainly not high among AST/SC staff or future applicants.
Providing a career path for AST/SC colleagues is simply a necessity.
 
This can be ensured by:
 
Further increase of promotion quotas :
There are still DGs where no promotion quota for AST/SCs has been granted since the creation of this category.
 
Guaranteeing wider access to internal competitions
AST/SC is the only category of officials without any mechanism for moving to another function group (AST/AD). Without access to annual internal competition, they are denied any chance to career development. Colleagues should also be able to participate in internal competitions in order to progress in their current career and have the possibility to reinforce the internal talent pool, rather than participating in external competitions to start a new career. The Commission should invest in the human capital that is already in-house.
 
Clarifying the long-term vision perspective for AST/SC and AST
In terms of tasks, there is often no distinction but it is clearly different in terms of salary and career perspective.
The 2014 Staff Regulations normally foresee an evaluation of the AST/SC category within 10 years of its creation. In this regard, 2023 (if not possible earlier) is the year to take on board and eliminate all the difficulties on staff development imposed by the AST/SC category.
Greater mobility must also be guaranteed for instance by opening up the access to posts in delegations)

R&D alongside with CA colleagues

Stop social doping ! Concerning Contractual Agents colleagues, the problem stems first from the establishment plan and the interpretation made by certain technocrats in the Administration, since officials and similar staff are listed on posts (temporary or permanent) and contract staff are only considered as "credits", whereas the vast majority are assigned to permanent functions.
 
This policy encourages social dumping and creates not only disharmony at all levels of our Institutions but above all reinforce the Member States in their willingness to destabilise the Institution, like a Trojan horse!
 
Apart from being very costly, this personnel policy has become humanly and technically unmanageable.
 
The institution must start by putting in place a real career management system for our CA colleagues with fair and transparent procedures for access to higher function groups and TA as well as permanent officials posts. 
 
Unlocking careers, strengthening social cohesion by "screening" all positions of responsibility would ensure greater consistency and satisfaction.
 
The grade bracket for the reclassification of contract agents should be reviewed: promotions should be faster, in order to enhance the work of colleagues and strengthen their motivation.
 
The entry grade for newly recruited CAs should adequately take into account the qualifications and very importantly: the level of responsibility that a given post entails.
 
The proposal to extend the duration of the contract goes in the right direction and will help to implement a genuine multi-annual policy of internal competitions allowing access to civil servant status with selection tests guaranteeing equal treatment among candidates and the objective charac¬ter of the selection.
 
For CA colleagues leaving the institution, the Commission must ensure the education costs of their children until the end of the school year.

R&D alongside with the colleagues of representations

R&D has always been on the side of the staff of representations and its representatives went constantly on the spot to be even more attentive to the specific problems encountered.
 
Thanks to these efforts, it was possible to obtain, the application of working time arrangements for all, the recognition of the years of seniority service of local agents, the resolution of individual cases, the defence of the expectations of the institution’s colleagues to become heads of representation by strongly opposing the massive use of external appointments.
 
Much still needs to be done in order to rebalance the workload and adapting the means in the representations.
 
It is crucial to involve staff in the event of reorganization of a representation, to restore true fairness in the financial conditions and to give real career prospects to CAs.

Career management

Mobility  

the Commission should propose real annual internal mobility exercises always on a voluntary basis.
 
Training should also allow for future career development and not only be linked to current tasks.

Performance management

Early detection of talent: this should not become a golden (internal) path to promote buddies. Clear criteria should be defined and communicated as well as a joint committee should be set up.
 
Poor and unsatisfactory performance: the new HR strategy only talks about assistance for the manager, not a single word to help the colleague!

End of career

The Commission has no end-of-career management policy and there is an urgent need to put it in place. We must put an end to the waste of the added value of the "50 and over" who are too often humiliated by a management incapable of valuing the wealth of all our staff.
 
Recognition of years spent in the service of the Institution must be rewarded in a more personalized manner.
 
The possibility of becoming “Active Senior” should be extended, valued and encouraged.