Brussels, 4 November 2020

                 CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC

R&D salutes the Hamiltonian emission of the SURE Bonds and

calls the European Commission to support

the European Parliament in increasing the next MFF

Dear Commissioner Hahn,

In our five previous communications (link), R&D federal, the largest Trade Union representing the staff of the EU In­stitu­tions, Executive and Decentralised Agencies and other EU Bodies, has called upon the President and the College to go against the grain and put on the table effective proposals to fight the recession.

We once again would like to thank sincerely the hundreds of colleagues who constantly show us their full sup­port and encourage us to tirelessly monitor to what extent the various European Institutions live up to the expec­tations of millions of citizens in every corner of the Union.

Along these lines, R&D federal therefore salutes the Hamiltonian emission of the SURE bonds that will keep hun­dreds of thousands of people in work via topping up various furlough national schemes.

Looking back at the pre-pandemic world, such a historic step would have been unimaginable both technically and politi­cally.

Once again, though, the EU has cleared the cards by both showing resilience against any prediction and indicating that it is precisely when threatened by an existential threat that it can perform at its best.

By registering at a subscription rate 13 times higher than its demand when launched last week, the social bonds have, in particular, demonstrated three things.

Firstly, they have showed the appeal and the solidity of the European block as a whole, the multi-annual yields offered to investors being a clear sign of this.

Secondly, they have paved the way both for the NextGenerationEU emissions and, possibly, for even more innovative macroeconomic tools to be launched in the future, as our economists taskforce has since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic pledged for.

Lastly, they have demonstrated the incredible adaptability of our staff. That same staff, whom you recently thanked in a series of video messages on the Intranet and showed your appreciation for, and who juggles since months bet­ween Teams meetings, home schooling and strict sanitary measures.

We believe this is the right way staff should be addressed and supported.

We would hence like to thank you for that and sincerely trust this approach will be consequential to invest in the European Institutions most hidden gem: its people.

Danger escaped? Not quite…

Regardless of these rays of light, R&D federal remains realistic and still believes that – unlike the proclamations of many politicians- that the worst is, unfortunately, yet to come.

The skyrocketing infection rate all around the Europe in these very days and the concrete prospect of an imminent – and generalised – harsh lockdown risk to leave even deeper scarves and wounds that the first lockdown.

In this respect, it is understood that the stall in the negotiations for the adoption of the next MFF is even more inexplicable in the eyes of the citizens, who need immediate answers to their daily issues and are tired of the old Brussels’ political drama.

Since weeks now, the big three (EC, EP and the Council) are, indeed, fighting on a € 39 billion increase across various headings of the next MFF (a rather marginal adjustment over a 7-year period in a Union of 27 member states!) with the serious and concrete risk to enter a provisional exercise.

We are quite sure you and the College appreciate that, the more time it passes, the less effective the approved package risks to be in its countercyclical effects.

We are conscious that with so many involved parties it is rather hard to find a compromise and that no involved stake­holder possess a magic wand.

Yet, we fear that the longer we wait the easier the tipping point will be reached.

It is indeed imperative that the positive change in the EU’s public opinion, which followed the lengthy approval of last sum­mer package, is not thrown away and that we speed up on this credibility capital.

The European Institutions, whose staff works on many different strands (from a vaccine to promoting intra-EU solidarity and coordinated EU responses, from medical equipment procurement to border controls, from helping SMEs to saving the tourism industry), need now to provide immediate economic relief.

That is even more necessary since the unemployment schemes in some Member States do not last much.

This is why, R&D federal is:

· Calling on you and the College to work tirelessly to find as soon as possible an ambitious outcome to the current Trilogue negotiations in view of a substantially increased budgetary envelope;

· Calling on you and the College to keep on investing on the European Institutions staff who has proved to be able to deliver meaningful results in very challenging circumstances;

 

On behalf of  R&D FEDERAL

Cristiano Sebastiani, R&D Commission, Executive and Decentralised agencies, other EU bodies

Beatrice Postiglione, R&D Council

Pasquale Ciuffreda, R&D European Parliament

Oren Wolff, R&D EEAS

Dimitrios Katsanidis, R&D CoR and EESC 

1: Hamiltonian – From Alexander Hamilton, Founding Father of the US who fought to increase the Federal power by co pleting the monetary union under George Washington Presidency.

 Brussels, 19 October 2020 

Next MFF

What about European public administration costs?

Europe will be forged in crises, and will be the sum of the solutions adopted for those crises (Jean Monnet)

At the beginning of the 21st century, the world is plunged into a health crisis for which the remedy and the vaccine are still in the experimental stage, whereas we might have deem this to be impossible, taking into account the advances in medicine and scientific research. However, the crisis not only claimed thousands of victims worldwide, but it has also generated an unprecedented economic crisis, leaving homes and businesses on the verge of bankruptcy. Moreover, there is an ecological crisis and the need to revise our lifestyles and working methods in order to favour the use of di­gital technology.

Through its communications ( link ), R&D, assisted by a task force of fellow economists, informed staff of the progress of discussions regarding the next MFF (Multiannual Financial Framework) and indicated the priorities that we believe should be retained.

We welcomed the fact that the European Commission, through the voice of our President, Ursula von der Leyen, had the ambition to propose in May 2020 a multiannual budget 2021-2027 of 1.85 trillion euros or 1.1 trillion euros in­tended for the MFF and 750 billion euros intended for the “Next generation EU” program to help the European Union in rebuilding itself as well as to support innovations in the green and digital transition.

We regretted the Council's decision to revise downwards the MFF's budget proposal by 26 billion euros, or 1.8243 tril­lion euros, while the European Parliament intended to increase it by 200 billion euros.

The Council's position is "a hard pill to swallow" as our President has so clearly indicated, especially as the climate, digital technology and Horizon Europe have been hit hard by this decrease. Faced with the July Council deal, MEPs even threatened not to approve the next budget.

Let it be said, let it be done

On Thursday 8 October, MEPs kept their promise and stopped ongoing discussions with Member States refusing to increase the budget for the multiannual financial framework at the risk of delaying the "Next generation EU" recovery plan. MEPs believe that the extra 9 billion proposed by the German presidency fall short ( link ). The trilogue should therefore resume in the coming days. R&D sincerely hopes that Member States will come to their senses by being more realistic about the means they say they want to commit for a Union that truly protects its citizens.

What about European public administration costs?

In the 2021-2027 multiannual budget, heading 7, which covers the costs of European public administration, amounts to 73.1 billion euros, or 6.8 % of the MFF, outside the "Next generation EU." As a reminder, this envelope amounted to 69.6 billion euros, or 6 % of the 2014-2020 multiannual budget.

During the “On-line talk: How the EU budget is being shaped?” organized by the European School of Administration - we must salute in passing the excellent work of our colleagues who organize very good debates open to all staff on different subjects -, Andreas Schwarz, Director at DG BUDG , was questioned on the budget share allocated to Euro­pean public administration.

Not only was Mr. Schwarz's expertise appreciated but also his very clear explanations and answers to the various questions asked by the participants.. We invite you to see or review this “On-line talk” ( link ).

To the question "Why is the budgetary share allocated to public administration so low? Is this due to the lack of the ‘new dimension’ or is there another reason? ". The Director replied that in the MFF the budgetary share allocated to public administration amounts to 70.8 billion euros and that the counter argument amounts to 73.1 billion euros. He recalled that this amount is based on "real prices" as well as the rate of inflation. According to him, the budget will not require cuts and will allow the continuity of staff development as well as that of salaries, while stressing that given the current circumstances many people have lost their jobs and feel insecure in the various Member States.

Therefore, it will not be necessary to reopen the Staff Regulations linked to the MFF!

Therefore, it is clear that, were they were not called into question before their adoption, the budgetary perspectives for heading 7 would not require a new reform of the Staff Regulations.

From a budgetary point of view, this confirms the assurances given on the political level by Commissioner Hahn and for which we would like to thank for once again, having ruled out that the Commission could immediately consider pre­senting a proposal for reform in connection with the COVID crisis.

It is equally clear that the requests addressed by certain MS to the Commission proposing a new reform of the Staff Regulations are based solely on the demagoguery of certain politicians who want to divert the attention of their electo­rate by continuing to attack the European public service. They are well aware, however, that the attractiveness of our public service decreases year after year and do not hesitate to complain about it. This is not the first time they contra­dict themselves in order to carry out their destructive project. Any pretext is good… There is nothing as narrow as a narrow mind…

Indeed, R&D has already formally denounced on various occasions and the Commission has finally ack­nowledged the harmful effects of the reforms, which have been following one another since 2004 on the attractiveness of our administration and the Court of Auditors itself, an independent body, underlined, in turn, the unreasonable scale of the cuts imposed by the last reform of 2014.

R&D stands on guard and keeps analysing very closely the dire consequences from the previous reforms of 2004 and 2014. We will remain vigilant and very attentive to the evolution of staff and / or real estate policies, so that these cannot further degrade working conditions, a degradation that is a psychosocial risk factor well identified by experts.

R&D will soon publish an in-depth analysis of these risks. We hope that our administration will take up over the findings of this analysis for the benefit of its staff.

Labor demands the elite of humans (Seneca)

R&D welcomes the proposal from MEPs of 14 October 2020 to reinforce the budget for EU flagship pro­grammes by 39 billion euros ( link ) and supports the ambition of our Institution, based on the founding va­lues of the EU, to come to the aid of the victims of this health crisis and to build a better future for the next genera­tions. We hope that this creative impetus will sensitize Member States and that they will choose the right path leading them to the human path and not that of budgetary restriction.

The ball is now in the hands of MEPs and Member States!

Cristiano Sebastiani,

President

 Brussels, 2 October 2020 

Note for the attention of Mr Johannes Hahn

Commissioner in charge of Human Resources and Budget 

Suject : COVID-19 health crisis

We would like to begin by thanking you sincerely and personally for your decision, taking due account of the evolution of the pandemic, to postpone the transition to Phase 2 which the administration had previou­sly announced a little hastily.

Thank you for making staff health a top priority

R&D welcomes your choices and thanks you for having, from the start of the pandemic, placed the health of staff as a top priority, favouring the approach of a safe working environment.

From the start of the pandemic, the staff of the institutions, mostly expatriates and often assigned far from their fami­lies, have often been prevented from moving freely within the Union, or even in certain cases of force majeure, as­signed to quarantine elsewhere than at their place of employment. R&D asks you to keep paying particular atten­tion to these situations, quite far from being deemed exceptional after so many months of health crisis and uncertain­ty. In this regard, we support with the greatest conviction the approach of the Central Staff Committee aimed at de­nouncing the profound differences in practices within the services with regard to the respect of instructions on tele­working abroad.

A staff of which our institution should be proud!

Indeed, while the health situation remains very worrying - even deteriorating - in a certain number of countries and regions and in particular in Brussels, the staff of the Institution, and their families, have been showing resilience and great ability to adapt to an uncertain situation.

In carrying out their duties, the staff has also - as on par with our President you have never failed to recognize it - demonstrated flexibility and a remarkable sense of responsibility by immediately acclimatising to the new working methods made essential by the context; this took place without weakening efficiency or motivation, and as a result, the overriding interest of our institution was preserved.

Overnight, the staff adapted and responded to the new requirements, anticipating the Green Deal and the digitalisa­tion of the Institution. In this regard, we would like to salute the professionalism of the technical and IT teams who have managed to swiftly  implement the radical changes to our working environment.

R&D supports with conviction the reform you advocate towards a new “culture of trust”

As you rightly pointed out, it is now important that management also evolves and moves from a “culture of control” to a “culture of trust”.

However, it is not enough to simply embrace this reform and announce it through frantic communication efforts, cur­rently being deployed within the framework of the exercise aiming at the "modernization" of the human resources policy of our institution.

Staff requests: "facta non verba"

To build and consolidate trust, all these good intentions have to be followed by action, regardless of the Ins­titution, Directorate-General, Agency or Office employing Institutions’ servants.

Unfortunately, we regret to notice that DG HR still does not seem capable of ensuring the essential consistency to the rules implemented by the many services of our institution, in allowing decisions at the most decentralized level because of the supposition that “staff and special situations are better known" at this level.

The result is a diverging application of the instructions in force, which is completely unacceptable when it comes to protecting the health of our colleagues.

Managers up to their missions ...

The vast majority of managers have been exemplary in managing this crisis by showing empathy and the utmost concern for their staff thereby building a climate of trust that will forever be remembered.

Others are definitely not ...

Others, unfortunately, in the absence of a real mastery at the central level, feel entitled to engage in personal and restrictive interpretations of the instructions in force and unnecessarily make the working conditions even more diffi­cult for colleagues under their responsibility.

The obsession with "face-to-face at all costs"

Excessive zeal going as far as the real permanent policing of teleworkers, pressing invitations to return to the office in anyway, even raising doubts as to the potential consequences on the annual evaluation and promotion exercise, criticisms and the openly displayed disappointment about your decision to delay the transition to phase 2… are all excessive or even offensive behaviours which only increase the already palpable anxiety among our most vulnerable colleagues.

Regarding the return to the office, it is not a question of preventing colleagues who in the greatest respect for the instructions in force wish to do so, but simply of preventing unacceptable pressures, or even ou­tright blackmail, from being exerted on the others who comply with the instructions in force.

The so-called "essential" missions

The same is true for the planning of the so-called "essential" missions that certain services are preparing to impose on colleagues with travels, including in countries heavily affected by the pandemic, currently perceiving from DG HR a relaxation of instructions in this regard.

In this regard, it is not reasonable, as DG HR envisages, to hand over to each line manager the responsibility of eva­luating, before sending colleagues on mission, "that the interest of the mission outweighs the risks to the personnel concerned ”, what is even more unacceptable when it comes to sending vulnerable personnel on mission.

While it is normal for each line manager to be called upon to assess the appropriateness of a mission, it is not ac­ceptable that the balance with the health risks of the mission managers is thus decentralized to the lowest level, in the absence of any mastery at the central level and entrusted to colleagues without any competence in the matter in allowing them to assess such risks.

These decisions must be taken with all the more caution as, by invoking the rules imposed very recently by Belgium concerning essential professional activities, colleagues returning from an "essential" mission of less than 48 hours, even in a country in the red zone are not subject to testing or quarantine. Far from being a matter of an allegedly reassuring "ease", these exemptions are invoked to impose an immediate return to the office and, on the contrary, risk plunging the staff going on mission into a state of fear not only about their health but also concerning the risk that on their return they could infect their family and their colleagues.

Once again, this is not to deny that, in exceptional cases, missions, despite the pandemic, may prove to be essential for our Institution to perform its tasks up to the expectations of our fellow citizens.

It is above all a matter of ensuring very strict and centralized control over the decision to consider a mission as ”essential", again avoiding any overzealousness and personal interpretation in this regard. And it is not enough to stress that such drifts would constitute an exception in all cases. When it comes to the health of colleagues, even a single abuse is utterly intolerable.

It is important that within our Institution everyone without exception accepts the reform in the management culture based on trust, advocated by yourself and which we support with conviction.

This concerns above all managers who still remain faithful to the painful authoritarian vision of their role based on mistrust, by constantly fuelling a climate of fear.

Faced with the pandemic and with the major uncertainty that remains on the evolution of the situation in the weeks and months to come, the change in culture must, more than ever, be real and the Institution's duty of care towards its staff must be reflected in reality, in all cases, at all times and within all departments.

In this regard, while being aware of the current strong pressure on the demand for vaccines of this type, we appeal to you so that our Institution sets up, this year, a vaccination campaign against seasonal influenza likely to respond to the request of our colleagues.

Faithful to its mission of always being at the side and at the service of staff, R&D will not fail to bring to your attention any difficulty that our colleagues may report to us.

Cristiano Sebastiani,

President

Copy:

Ms. G. Ingestad, Director-General of DG HR

M. C. Roques, Director of Directorate HR/D

Mr. E. Sakkers, Head of Unit HR/E.1

The staff

 TRAINING FOR EPSO OPEN COMPETITION

For the preparation of the open competition EPSO AST-SC/10/20 SECRETARIES (SC 1/SC 2) R&D and its team of highly qualified trainers will offer a preparatory training session in English.

The session will focus on the pre-selection tests  - PROFESSIONAL  SKILLS

 Please find the details below:

Date	Time	Topics	Trainer	Location
20.10.2020	17:30 – 19:00	·         Accuracy & Precision ·         Prioritising & Organising	Frédéric Maillet	Webinar

 TO REGISTER…

We invite you to register for the training session by sending an e-mail to :

JRC-RD-ISPRA@ec.europa.eu -  by 12.10.2020 noon.

Our trainings are FREE for R&D members and those who wish to join us.

If you are not yet a member and wish to benefit from our trainings and other services, we will be glad to welcome you. Join our Union, Become a Member

All registered participants will receive a confirmation and details to access the webinar!

Questions or comments?  Don't hesitate to contact us via e-mail at JRC-RD-ISPRA@ec.europa.eu or call our office : Ext. 9645 (Monday to Friday 9:00 - 13:00) 

Your R&D Team

    

EUROPEAN COMMISSION    
JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE

The Director-General

                                                                                    

 

Brussels, 19/08/2020
JRC/SQ

Dear Mr Tirendi, dear Mr Kenny,

Thank you for sharing your thoughts about the upcoming launch of the JRC Editorial Review Board.

When I was first briefed about the introduction of a clear editorial review policy in the JRC with the newly created editorial board, I felt that my predecessors had taken an important and well thought through initiative. As a result, we now have an authorisation process with all steps necessary to be able to take full responsibility, as an organisation, for the science and knowledge that we produce. That is a professional approach appropriate for a Commission service. 

My predecessor reacted to most of your questions in an earlier letter and I fully agree with her arguments. The editorial review streamlines the JRC’s publication procedure for scientific manuscripts. It is a tailor-made process, well-documented, transparent with the same criteria across the whole organisation and the shortest possible delay.

That said, I understand that some concerns persist as regards issues have been raised in the past, for instance during the JRC Scientific Integrity Road Show in 2018/2019.We are therefore going to make an additional effort to clarify all questions raised through the planned communication campaign, so as to ensure that the finer points of the editorial review are fully understood by everyone.

From September, the Editorial Board - Koen Jonkers and his team - will continue with a series of meetings with directorates and units where they will discuss the details of the new process. They have already launched their website on Connected, which also deals with frequently asked questions, such as for example the review for articles in peer-reviewed journals.

Our objective remains for the editorial review to start immediately after the September campaign. We believe that it has been designed in a way to fit well with our work, but will of course keep it under careful review in the initial phase. We will also ensure that the process is evaluated in due course, so as to assess its performance, costs, benefits and any potential adjustment needs.

Yours sincerely,

Stephen QUEST

c.c.: B. Magenhann, D. Al Khudhairy, M. Landabaso Alvarez, P. Szymanski, G. De Santi, D. Chirondojan, G. Van den Eede, M. Betti, P. Duponteil, K. Maruszewski, X. Troussard.

 

NOTE SENT BY R&D TO MR QUEST, DG JRC ON 29/07/2020 - JERB - NUTCRACKER OR SLEDGEHAMMER?

Subject: A vision for the future of the Ispra site
Reference: Ares(2020)3730594
understand that similar issues have already been raised by you with the previous College, and
take good note of the fact that you are now reverting to this matter in the new context of the
I will not repeat the positions already expressed on this matter by former Commissioners
Oettinger and Navracsics and former Vice-President Georgieva. Suffice it to say that the JRC is
generally considered to have achieved major progress in recent years in positioning itself as
strategic partner of the Commission and its policymaking. It has also built up its site
management services to a high level of expertise and professionalism. Having said that, I also
We are currently very much focused on the preparation of the JRC Work Programme under the
next MFF and, as you know, the negotiation of the specific sectoral programmes (including
Horizon and Euratom), and the available budgets, have yet to be finalised. We are also still
That said, I hope we will be able to find the time to meet and further exchange ideas when the
circumstances improve later on this year and I finally get the opportunity to travel to the Ispra